Skip to main content

NAAC accreditation software and NBA accreditation management software for Indian colleges

Kwilo helps IQAC coordinators and HoDs prepare the outcome-based evidence NAAC and NBA reviews expect, generated from live assessment data rather than reconstructed the month before a peer team visit. Kwilo supports accreditation readiness, it does not decide or guarantee the outcome.

What NAAC and NBA accreditation readiness actually involves

A NAAC Self Study Report (SSR) covers seven criteria, from curricular aspects to governance, and an NBA Self Assessment Report (SAR) requires criterion-wise attainment data across a rolling three-year window. Both demand evidence that faculty across every department have been consolidating in spreadsheets for months before submission, assessment marks, CO-PO mapping, survey responses, and remedial action records. The work is less about any single number and more about keeping evidence consistent and traceable across an entire academic cycle, so that a peer team reviewer can follow any figure back to where it came from.

Built for IQAC coordinators, HoDs, and accreditation committees

IQAC coordinators typically own the SSR submission timeline and have to chase department-wise data from every HoD, then reconcile formats that rarely match. HoDs, in turn, need a way to see which courses in their department already have complete CO-PO attainment records and which are still missing data, well before the submission deadline arrives. Kwilo gives both groups a shared view: coordinators see consolidated readiness across departments, and HoDs see exactly which of their courses still need assessment data or CO mapping filled in.

How Kwilo supports SSR and SAR preparation

Kwilo's outcome-based education engine, the same one behind our CO-PO attainment tracker, computes direct and indirect CO attainment from assessment marks and exit surveys already collected in the platform, then exports it in NBA Tier-1 SAR, NBA Tier-2 SAR, and NAAC SSR Criterion II (Teaching-Learning and Evaluation) formats. Every figure in the export links back to the assessment record it came from, so a reviewer can verify a number during the visit instead of taking a spreadsheet on faith. This page is about that readiness workflow across departments and the accreditation cycle; if you specifically need the attainment computation itself, that lives on our CO-PO attainment tracker page. Kwilo's scope covers the outcomes and evaluation evidence, criteria like infrastructure, governance, and institutional finances still need to be documented through your existing processes.

Early signal from pilot institutions

IQAC coordinators in our early pilot cohort of 12 institutions, covering roughly 850 learners, are using Kwilo to consolidate CO-PO attainment ahead of their accreditation cycles. The consistent feedback is that the biggest relief isn't a faster spreadsheet, it's not having to rebuild the same department-wide mapping from scratch every cycle. Kwilo doesn't decide accreditation outcomes, that judgment rests with the NAAC or NBA peer team.

Request a demo

View pricing

Frequently asked questions

Related solutions